The Myth of the Fight-Free Family

Who has a fight-free family? Whenever I ask this question of my audience everybody looks round the room: all hoping that another person will admit that a lot of mornings, by the end of breakfast time, their family has fought a minumum of one major battle already. There’s big smiles of relief when I inform them the truth about families – all families fight!

In my own book, Fight-Free Families I list fifteen reasons for fights that commonly occur in the family setting. For instance, family fight to say their rights, for attention, to guard themselves or their property, to safeguard their self-esteem, for status or for power.

Family fights give us experiences which we can take out into the real life. We learn that sometimes fighting for the sake of the principle is important, and sometimes we have been wasting our time.

feud questions is where people learn that fighting can be physical, emotional, and political and that they can result in hurts for everybody -hurt bodies, hurt feelings and insufficient trust.

In most functional (mostly) families, the hurts are resolved. Parents set values about cooperation and forgiveness and the importance of “blood” in “being there” for each other. Competitive siblings mature and undertake their individual identities and forget about their need to compete.

Sometimes, however, in the dysfunctional family context, hurts are toxic and are never resolved.

It all starts with the parents, who have the responsibility of teaching the difference between being “right” and being “happy”. Children should try to learn that it’s impossible for the household puppy to “be cut in half” for it to be shared. They must take turns. Children have to learn that life is not fair. Life is not about equal shares -it’s in regards to a dance of justice and reality. For instance, older children may perceive which have very restricted privileges or even more responsibility compared with the freedom the younger child may get. However older children often receive more status and property than youngsters.

Parents who take on a “Joan of Arc” righteousness to insist on their principles, risk the backlash of family feuds where one party sets up contrary to the other to prove another right or wrong.

Parents also have to teach the significance of compassion and forgiveness. That is very important for the child who may have end up being the ‘irresponsible one” of the family (and most families have one of these brilliant, whose very birth order may have greatly contributed with their position as scapegoat). Just think of the Prodigal Son! Certainly, the responsible child should not be disadvantaged, neither if the irresponsible child be rescued from the results of their behaviour. However there’s always a method to preserve people boundaries and preserve blood ties if you have a good intention.

The parents have to lead the household towards reconciliation and the kids need to be ready to be lead. If you have “too much water under the bridge” – too much proving right and wrong for too long – the reality of the initial reason behind the fight is most likely forgotten anyway. The household loses the very structure of its substance. And no-one wins.

Leave a Reply